Penilaian Keberkesanan Kursus Etika dan Tamadun Berdasarkan Model Cipp: Analisis Faktor Eksploratori
Evaluation of The Effectiveness of The Ethics & Civilization Course Based on The Cipp Model: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/jpi.v17i1.294Keywords:
Ethics, Civilization, Effectiveness, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)Abstract
Evaluation is a comprehensive data collection procedure that provides an initial assessment of the effectiveness of a program or curriculum. As a result, the purpose of this study is to examine the efficiency of the ethics and civilization course for UiTM Kota Kinabalu Sabah branch students using the CIPP model. This study is entirely quantitative, involving survey methodologies and questionnaire procedures. As respondents, 150 students from ethics and civilization courses participated. Cronbach's Alpha reliability and Exploratory Factor Analysis were used to assess the data descriptively (EFA). Since of outliers in the normalcy analysis, three respondents were eliminated from this study. Cronbach's Alpha is 0.952, which is above 0.70 as a result of the achieved normality value. Meanwhile, the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) results show four factors with Elgen values in excess of 1.0 and KMO values (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) of 0.942 ≥ 0.6, indicating that variable items in the evaluation of the efficiency of the ethics and civilization course are intercorrelated. We identified a new factor that influences the evaluation of the efficiency of the ethics and civilization course as a result of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) test. Following that, the Bartlett test is significant (Chi Square 6745.895, p < 0.05). This study included no exclusions, and all loading factor values were found to be greater than 0.05. As a result, the overall findings suggest that the items for evaluating ethics and civilization courses may be measured and answered the study's objectives. A total of 45 items have been validated and are suitable for measuring the success of CIPP-based ethics and civilization courses.
References
A.C Ornstein dan F.P Hunkins, (1988), Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues, Prentice Hall: New Jersey Englewood Cliffs.
Bashri A., Prastiwi, S,M., & Praspuwati, P, R., (2020), CIPP Model for Curiculum Evaluation of Biology Education, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 491, 1247-1251. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ijcah-20/125947250
Bentri, A., (2017), Evaluation Input of Early Childhood Teacher Education Curriculum Faculty of Education Universitas Negeri Padang, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR) 169, International Conference of Early Childhood Education, 131-133. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icece-17/25889751
Awang, Z. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modelling. Bandar Baru Bangi, MPWS Rich Resources.
Yahaya, A,. (2001), Penggunaan Model Kontek. Input, Proses dan Produk (KIPP) dalam Penilaian Program Pembelajaran. Sejauh Manakah ia Relevan?, International Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education, Concorde Hotel Shah Alam. 16 & 17 July 2001. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/2241/1/puitm.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Filella-Guin, G., & Blanch-Plana, A. (2002). Imprisonment and career development: An evaluation of a guidance program for job finding, Journal of Career Development, 29(1), 55-68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241652672_Imprisonment_and_Career_Development_An_Evaluation_of_a_Guidance_Programme_for_Job_Finding
Muda, H., Lognathan,N., Awang, Z., Jusoh, H., & baba,S,Z., (2018). Application of Theory, Methodology and Analsis in Condusting Research: A Practical guide to Quantitative Research and Thesis Writing. Penerbitan. Penerbit Unisza. ISBN:978- 967-2231-11-0.
Hair, J.F., Bbin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C., (2018) Multivariate Data Analysis;8th edition. Cengage ISBN: 9781473756540 .
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2018). A Primer on Partial LeastSquares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Second Edition. Los Angeles. Sage.
Karatas Hakan & Fer Seval (2011), CIPP Evaluation Model Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity, Procedia Social and Behaviorial Sciences 15, 592-599. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811003259
Mohammad, k., (2021). Program Evaluation: An Analysis of Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model. Faculty Member of Bangladesh Public Administration Training Centre, Savar, Dhaka. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352462214_Programme_Evaluation_An_Analysis_of_Context_Input_Process_and_Product_CIPP_Model
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3th ed.).The Guilford Press.
Mahmud, Alias. (2015). Penggunaan Model Cipp Dalam Penilaian Kurikulum Separa Perubatan. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia (PPPSM 2013), 28-29 Februari 2012, Universiti Putra Malaysia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285421654_PENGGUNAAN_MODEL_CIPP_DALAM_PENILAIAN_KURIKULUM_SEPARA_PERUBATAN
Agustina, Q, N., & Mukhtaruddin, F., (2019), The CIPP Model-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) Program at Language Center English Language, Teaching Educational Journal (ELTEJ) 2 (1), 22-31. http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/article/view/1043
Noor, N., Beram, S., & Janan, D. (2021), Penerokaan & Pengesahan Instrumen Penerimaan Aplikasi Flipgrid Berdasarkan Modifikasi Model Tam Dalam Pembentangan Video Pelajar: Analisis Faktor Penerokaan (EFA). JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 9(2), 1-11. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JUKU/article/view/29936/13026
Anriani,N., Hidayat, S., Mantin, R., (2021). Context, Input, Process, And Product (CIPP) Model Program Evaluation with A Management Approach At National Research Agency Education And Training Center. Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils.
Samuels, P. (2017) Advice on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Technical Report. ResearchGate, 9/06/2017Sudalyo, R. A. T. (2021). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Radio Swasta di Surakarta: Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 1(11), 1-444.
Scriven, M. (1994). Product evaluation: The state of the art. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 45-62.
Shamsa Aziz, Munazza Mahmood, Zahra Rehman. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development 5 (1), 189-206.
Shinkfield, A. J., and D. L. Stufflebeam (1985), Systematic Evaluation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Herold & Beulah, M. K. (1983). The CIPP Model for Evaluation, In: Evaluation Models, Evaluation in Education and Human Services, 117-141.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007), “Evaluation Theory, Models, And Applications”, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vo Thi Kim Anh & Vincent Pang (2021), The Application of CIPP Model To Evaluate Online Teaching For English Majored Programs in Vietnam During the Covid-19 Pandemic, JIRSEA 19 (2), 146-310.
Wahab, N. J. A. (2022). Penggunaan Analisis Faktor Penerokaan (EFA) Bagi Pengujian Kesahan Instrumen Perkongsian Pengetahuan. Jurnal ILMI, 12(1), 127-133.
Worthen, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987), Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches And Practical Guidelines, New York: Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pengajian Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
